Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 05:11:36 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r350505 - in head: contrib/binutils/binutils/doc gnu/usr.bin/binutils/objdump Message-ID: <CAPyFy2DsvPdt9XFWKW=p%2BmGK=hfzwqQoy3PTejz=vUjGS%2BouSg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9A3E35C8-7CB9-4E5C-92F4-367715A9909E@gmail.com> References: <201908011442.x71Egfa9047254@repo.freebsd.org> <23d23900d06581050562951f5cf6a625235a059f.camel@freebsd.org> <CAPyFy2AxES0Sn29ELRHETQ-d3UvKSnskR8up_6_pV7cY9-iJkA@mail.gmail.com> <9A3E35C8-7CB9-4E5C-92F4-367715A9909E@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 18:54, Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thought: could this be modified in an iterative manner, like “objdump” -> “gobjdump” / “llvm-objdump” -> “objdump”, etc (assuming llvm and gnu objdump are largely compatible)? It could, and we have done that sort of thing in the past. But here we should be retiring the old binutils tools well before 13.0 and I don't think it's worth the extra complexity.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DsvPdt9XFWKW=p%2BmGK=hfzwqQoy3PTejz=vUjGS%2BouSg>