Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:47:27 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <freebsd@hub.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: IPv6 <-> NAT <-> IPv4 ... possible? Message-ID: <6C9CF4C3635197B3CBED0D78@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Could I hide an IPv6 network behind NAT? I don't know if that is even possible ... the IPv6 IPs would be private (equiv to 192.168.x.x) ... basically, none of the hosts behind NAT need a public IP, *but* I may end up with more then 256 hosts, so was wondering if using IPv6 behind the NAT would be 'simplier' ... If possible, pointers to docs to read would be appreciated ... Thanks ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHGETv4QvfyHIvDvMRApvkAKCiOKnBaN1dvhAX6f5SxXUBk9DreQCdEqh0 QbNARJ2zQhsnlOn33OfNe38= =zWda -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6C9CF4C3635197B3CBED0D78>