Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:31:05 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG, Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.ORG>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Patches reviewed [was: Re: [REPORT] Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT] Message-ID: <20021201193105.GA4402@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021201121130.75329A-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <20021201121355.A26595@locore.ca> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021201121130.75329A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:12:36PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > There I go reply to all... <sigh> > > > > > > IIRC, we never supported upgrade to 4.0 or 4.1 from anybut but the > > > *latest* version in the 3.x series. I sure hope we adopt the same policy > > > here. > > > > Agree, I don't see any use in supporting upgrades without going through > > 4.x-STABLE first. > > It's nice that you guys are in agreement on that fact, but perhaps you'd > like to do something constructive like to look at and review the patches? Done. The patches look good. > Avoiding the install of a new make during a build is highly desirable, > even if you don't believe in updating from old RELENG_4. Agreed (it's so nice to be in agreement :-) A regular buildworld failed even when upgrading a less-than-a-week old -current. The removal of anything we install as part of a build phase is good and not tied to the (version) distance of the upgrade. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021201193105.GA4402>