Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 01:43:39 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: des@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks chapter.sgml Message-ID: <20030507014339.2e467c3a.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030506224205.J5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <200305051936.h45JaAc4099544@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030506224205.J5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 May 2003 22:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > What's the purpose of this change? The words are basically synonyms, and > either is appropriate in context. > > On Mon, 5 May 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote: > > > hmp 2003/05/05 12:36:10 PDT > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks chapter.sgml > > Log: > > Use 'irrelevant' instead of 'moot'. > > > > Approved by: des (mentor) > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.157 +1 -1 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks/chapter.sgml > > Actually, and according to my dictionary, irrelevant is more correct here. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030507014339.2e467c3a.trhodes>