Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:09:03 -0700 From: David Newman <dnewman@networktest.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update says -p3, but i've got -p2 Message-ID: <4882038F.6060805@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <488188C2.5090705@gmail.com> References: <20080714233542.GA59789@root.ucsc.edu> <487BE866.2000309@gmail.com> <488188C2.5090705@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Mark Boolootian wrote: >>> which leads me to conclude I've got -p3, including the BIND update. >>> However 'uname -a' says something else: >>> >>> FreeBSD mumble.ucsc.edu 7.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed >>> Jun 18 07:33:20 UTC 2008 >>> root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >>> >>> And although /usr/sbin/named has been updated, it appears not to have >>> been upgraded: >>> >>> $ /usr/sbin/named -v >>> BIND 9.4.2 >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >> >> You've got p3, don't worry. There was no kernel update in p3, hence >> you got the p2 GENERIC kernel. If you want uname to actually show p3, >> you will have to recompile your kernel Shouldn't freebsd-update do this, not only for the kernel and named and whatever else it updates? I'm relatively new to freebsd-update, and while I appreciate its speed advantange over make buildworld/buildkernel, it's confusing when it applies updates but does not display correct version numbers. dn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4882038F.6060805>