Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:45:49 +0100 From: Marc "UBM" Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I like SCHED_4BSD Message-ID: <20040312014549.2e4ecfb3.ubm@u-boot-man.de> In-Reply-To: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867FD@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867FD@bragi.housing.ufl.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:32:35 -0500 "Will Saxon" <WillS@housing.ufl.edu> wrote: > > I couldn't agree more. After doing the suggested mappings in > > libmap.conf > > and recompiling apps I can see a drastic difference in load times > > and performance between ULE and 4BSD. Using ULE the load wait for > > firefox could be anywhere from 10-30 seconds while with 4BSD it is a > > constant 4 > > second load time. When switching between desktops it can take > > up to 10 > > seconds to redraw the screen. This sluggishness isn't exclusive to > > firefox, opera and openoffice are noticeably laggy under ULE > > as well. I > > WANT to like and use ULE but the performance just isn't there. > > I am not experiencing this with firefox. It takes 2-3 seconds to load. > I am also not experiencing issues with screen redraws. Same here, using 5.2.1-RELEASE on a dual 450Mhz P2-Xeon. Firebird takes about 10 seconds to load and I have no issues with screen redraws even though I'm using a xinerama configuration with two PCI cards. Bye Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040312014549.2e4ecfb3.ubm>