Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:07:17 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems loading RV620 firmware Message-ID: <CAPyFy2BzUBogt01tVKcSinL15yZC6ayZZA_6JY9gbUukXAvKog@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53C92342.9070507@dumbbell.fr> References: <E1X88Aj-00032n-Ut@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> <53C92342.9070507@dumbbell.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 July 2014 09:38, Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> wrote: > On 18.07.2014 15:26, Pete French wrote: >> I havent tried that yet, but I can give that a go later - does >> 'GENERIC' still use syscons ? The commens imply it does, but I >> thought it had changed over to using vt. > > No, syscons is still the default in GENERIC for all branches of FreeBSD. One minor clarification on this point - in HEAD and stable/10 both syscons and vt are enabled in GENERIC, and one can be selected at boot time via the kern.vty tunable. Syscons is indeed the default in both branches for now. The changes to allow them to coexist were not merged to stable/9, so there vt(4) is available only as a build-time option.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2BzUBogt01tVKcSinL15yZC6ayZZA_6JY9gbUukXAvKog>