Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:24:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>, "'current@freebsd.org'" <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost Message-ID: <200104171724.f3HHOqh94775@earth.backplane.com> References: <200104161634.f3GGYZs11356@aslan.scsiguy.com> <200104162146.f3GLkGT82369@earth.backplane.com> <3ADBF9FA.9D1C4DB4@DougBarton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:Matt Dillon wrote:
:
:> It is not implying that at all. There is no black and white here.
:> This is a case where spending a huge amount of time and complexity
:> to get the efficiency down to the Nth degree is nothing but a waste
:> of time. What matters is what the user sees, what performance
:> the application gets, and how many bugs you introduce when optimizing
:> something that might not need optimizing.
:
: Sooo..... sounds like making "on" the default in -current is a worthy
:experiment?
:
:Doug
:--
Testing it 'on' in stable on production systems and observing the
relative change in performance is a worthy experiment. Testing it
'on' in current is just an experiment.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104171724.f3HHOqh94775>