Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:42:39 +0300 From: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@FreeBSD.org> To: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, killing@multiplay.co.uk Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 Message-ID: <20131011104238.GQ44942@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E1VUZwW-0002TR-Br@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> References: <20131010180936.GP44942@gmail.com> <E1VUZwW-0002TR-Br@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:27:36AM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the > > device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE > > succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not > > disable TRIM. Pete, isn't this your case? > > Afraid not, both machines are running normal "spinning rust" hard > drives as the actual storage layer, so there is nothing TRIM capable > anywhere. > > I didnt get much chnace to look at this yesterday, but am looking at the logs > again now, and I see these messages right up to the time the machine > fell over. That machine had been up for a long time, and it was still logging > these messages, so it looks very much as if ZFS did not stop trying to > issue the TRIM. You showed only "Remote request failed" errors from your logs. Do you have "Local request failed" errors too? -- Mikolaj Golub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131011104238.GQ44942>