Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:06:56 +0200 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 120788 for review Message-ID: <4661BFD0.1080107@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200706021756.l52Huq9A049371@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200706021756.l52Huq9A049371@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rui Paulo wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=120788 > > Change 120788 by rpaulo@rpaulo_epsilon on 2007/06/02 17:55:58 > > Add locking. > > Affected files ... Ah, but it seems you don't use a "fast" interrupt handler, so you should not use a spinlock... spinlocks should only be used in fast interrupt handlers, otherwise you bring up all the disvantages of the model... Attilio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4661BFD0.1080107>