Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:49:17 -0700 From: Jon Rust <jpr@vcnet.com> To: "Artem Koutchine" <matrix@chat.ru>, <questions@freebsd.org> Cc: <hardware@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Motherborad/Memory/CPU for web hosting system Message-ID: <p04310149b524fe21fc46@[209.239.239.22]> In-Reply-To: <002d01bfaabb$d3453e40$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru> References: <002d01bfaabb$d3453e40$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Get a dual if you can. The SMP code works very well, and you'll be happy you did when the server starts getting busy (especially with DB lookups if you do them). I wouldn't be afriad of 4.0. The FreeBSD development team kicks butt, and they've had quite a while to work the bugs out. Is it bug free? No. For my purposes, 4.0-S appears to be as bug free as 3.4-S. Just my 2 cents... jon At 3:24 PM +0400 4/20/00, Artem Koutchine wrote: >Hi! > >I am trying to pick a hardware config for a server which must hosts >dozens of web server. It is going to be a commercial hosting and >i picked FreeBSD as OS because of many personal reasons:) Now >i must pick some x86 compat platform hardware. > >What I am thinking about right now is : Asus P2B-LS motherboard, >Pentium III above 500, 512MB ram, 1 SCSI 10GB, 1 SCSI 30GB, >1 UDMA IDE AS BIG AS IT CAN BE for backup. The main problem >is the motherboard. I just don't see any alternative and that;s bad. I'd >like >to have a choice. It seems like the newer i820 bases motherboards from Asus >have SCSI contrller Ultra160 which is not supported by 3.4 ( i'd rather no >go with 4.0). But on the other hand BX is kind old now. > >If you have some experience with hosting a lot of web servers, please, share >the hardware config with me. > >Artem To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p04310149b524fe21fc46>