Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:50:09 -0400 From: dochawk@psu.edu To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Use of the UNIX Trademark Message-ID: <200110101550.f9AFo9Z02586@fac13.ds.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Oct 2001 22:37:17 PDT." <003301c14e28$f5ed1be0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>It's a damn shame that the UNIX term was ever got into this mess to begin >with but what do you expect from AT&T. there are many things to blame AT&T for, but I don't think that this is one of them. AT&T's hands were so tied by assorted (usually silly) antitrust rulings and issues that it very frequently could not even *do* the rational thing. I'm amazed that they managed to get unix into the wild in the first place . . . -- What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110101550.f9AFo9Z02586>