Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:02:30 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Vulpes Velox <kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Daemon's Advocate article Message-ID: <20040303050149.H79809@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <20040301151906.34565604@vixen42.> References: <20040229222159.GA47191@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20040301151906.34565604@vixen42.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:09:33 -0800 > Johnson David <DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> wrote: > > > On Sunday 29 February 2004 02:21 pm, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > > > http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200402/dadvocate.html > > > > > > I found the article very interesting. > > > > > > What do you all think? What is being done to keep BSD from ending > > > up where Greg says it might be going - suitable only for > > > developers? > > > > What is being done? Nothing. I get the impression that no one "in > > charge" is the slightest bit concerned about the FreeBSD user. This > > is most notable on the desktop side, but it extends to any user. > > There's this attitude that if you want something in FreeBSD, you > > must do it yourself. > > :/ The big problem is there is needed a desktop distro... and a good > gtk+ front end to the ports, rc.conf, and sysctl. > +1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040303050149.H79809>