Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 03:28:53 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: d@delphij.net, delphij@delphij.net Cc: dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipv6_ifconfig_<ifname> vs ifconfig_<ifname>_ipv6 Message-ID: <20110806.032853.106871784954085489.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4E3C2DDA.7060700@delphij.net> References: <4E3C2DDA.7060700@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug__6_03_28_53_2011_036)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> wrote in <4E3C2DDA.7060700@delphij.net>: de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- de> Hash: SHA256 de> de> Hi, de> de> It seems that in 9.x the preferred way of configuring an IPv6 enabled de> interface have been changed from ipv6_ifconfig_<ifname> to de> ifconfig_<ifname>_ipv6, and there is no corresponding way of configuring de> aliases as they are merged into ifconfig_<ifname>_alias<X>. de> de> Will ipv6_ifconfig_<ifname> and _alias be removed in 10, or they would de> stay for a while? This would need some changes in third party software de> like FreeNAS and ifconfig_<ifname>_ipv6 is not yet supported in 8.x I think. $ipv6_ifconfig_* will be removed in 10. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug__6_03_28_53_2011_036)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk48NmYACgkQTyzT2CeTzy05RgCg1tpuTbkxi1xuLbeDlRL2OFqU B5IAn0ySngzddvL/2vt0JJ4VC8iDSoYA =smOv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug__6_03_28_53_2011_036)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110806.032853.106871784954085489.hrs>