Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400 From: bdsfbsd@att.net To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Jail question Message-ID: <op.vkmol2qbhtl4zj@ack5833s2.ad.service.osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20101015093244.69e01d83@scorpio> References: <a326819258145be7f52702ca68402e23.squirrel@www.webcontracts.co.uk> <4CB84A9B.7080605@a1poweruser.com> <20101015093244.69e01d83@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry <freebsd.user@seibercom.net> = wrote: > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400 > Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> articulated: > >> Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports >> collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task >> of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean time you can get >> qjail from here. http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/files/ > > I have submitted new ports in the past and they were usually accepted > and posted within a short period of time; usually 2 weeks or so. Perha= ps > there is a specific reason why this port has not been accepted/release= d > into the ports system. Have you, or whom ever submitted the port, > requested clarification as to why it has not been accepted/released? > Before issuing a blank condemnation of the port's department it would > seem like the logical course of action. If you don't receive a > satisfactory reply with two weeks, then it might be worth escalating > the matter. > > Just my 2=A2. > I'm pretty sure I've seen this conversation between the same people befo= re. Ah, yes: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg235282.html= Noting that Aiza =3D FBSD8...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.vkmol2qbhtl4zj>