Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:28:39 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: Antonio Gonz?lez Castro <agoca80@gmail.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> Subject: Re: RFC: C version of devd daemon. Message-ID: <20090612202839.GA93343@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090612193614.GF48776@hoeg.nl> References: <538f43900906120823w388f1c63ic8d0194017faca6d@mail.gmail.com> <20090612165518.GA15530@phenom.cordula.ws> <20090612172740.GA1952@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20090612175206.GA77895@freebsd.org> <20090612180906.GA12679@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20090612193614.GF48776@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:36:14PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > The difference is that devd is required for a functioning > > system while neither groff nor libstdc++[1] would be required. > > No, it isn't. Your system just runs fine when you turn off devd. The > biggest disadvantage is probably that your USB mouse won't work when you > plug it in. > which means your system does *not* "run fine" without devd. :-) -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090612202839.GA93343>