Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 13:14:01 -0500 (CDT) From: James Wyatt <jwyatt@rwsystems.net> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeSSH Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910131307410.60569-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net> In-Reply-To: <199910130258.MAA62519@ares.maths.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Greg Lewis wrote: > In the interests of minimising bloat we could balance its inclusion by > deleting something like, say, uucp. > (:-) for the uucps users) As another heavy UUCP user on several machine here (and owner of CD sets for 2.26/2.28/3.2/3.3/etc...) I wouldn't mind a wel-done package if it still used /etc/uucp and added the UUCP user. I also would not mind it being another optinal binset on the install. I have been saving a fair amount of room on my hosts by removing the yp executables we *never* want and the 3MB+ of Japanese manpages we can't read. I'm sure there are more examples of 'things that could be default unchecked boxes in the install' things. - Jy@ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910131307410.60569-100000>