Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:24:43 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E5le?= Kristoffersen <staalebk@ifi.uio.no> To: Vince <jhary@unsane.co.uk> Cc: current@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E5le?= Kristoffersen <staale@kristoffersen.ws> Subject: Re: Slow networkperformance in current? Message-ID: <20070720122443.GA29372@eschew.pusen.org> In-Reply-To: <46A06D8D.1070604@unsane.co.uk> References: <20070716190441.GA19282@eschew.pusen.org> <b1fa29170707161247r1a9421cbxf4ec9be1e4c63f7d@mail.gmail.com> <20070716213425.GB19282@eschew.pusen.org> <20070718041159.GC37935@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20070718044700.GE37935@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20070718124350.GA25799@eschew.pusen.org> <46A06D8D.1070604@unsane.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-07-20 at 09:08, Vince wrote: > Silly as it might seem when did you last recompile the iperf port? I was > about to post a me too post yesterday, until I updated my system to use > the latest sched_ule at which point iperf froze my system completely, > recompiling the port fixed the freeze and the <100Mbit/sec on localhost. > I think it was compiled against the wrong threading library (been a > while since i last recompiled it.) Actually I just spotted this myself, when I recompiled I got in the range of 600Mbits/sec to localhost. However I do noot see the increase you see when running it multiple times. I still think 600Mbits/sec is a bit low. If I run it to a remote host I see the same numbers (around 600Mbits/sec) -- Ståle Kristoffersen staalebk@ifi.uio.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070720122443.GA29372>