Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 16:13:54 -0700 From: Studded <Studded@dal.net> To: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM question (QCAM question) Message-ID: <35F1C5B2.ED7D650F@dal.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.02.9809051806460.2918-100000@zone.syracuse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Feldman wrote: > > Well, hell, maybe I need to start a complete reimplimentation of the > QuickCam driver!! In the short term, though, I can work on a few things: > * VC support (at least to make it not crash!) > - I have access to a QuickCam VC, so I can certainly test > it out; I will attempt to look for more information regarding the > protocol, but if I run into any NDA's, I'm not gonna be able to contribute > any code I make :( > * ppbus support... sure, don't see that being way too hard > Any caveats for me before I start with the VC stuff? While you're working on it, why not plan to make a port out of it instead of planning to put it back in the base? Is there any reason that it would need to be in the base, especially given that there is a userland version that (TMK) runs just fine? These aren't rhetorical questions btw. If there is a good reason I'd love to hear it, otherwise my vote is that it should be a port. Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** At Barry (a small town in south Wales) hidden cameras have had to be installed to keep watch on the town's CCTV [Closed Circuit Television] to record acts of vandalism against the CCTV. - Privacy Forum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35F1C5B2.ED7D650F>