Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:31:54 +0800
From:      David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
To:        Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 65074 for review
Message-ID:  <4197422A.4020905@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041114062748.GH997@green.homeunix.org>
References:  <200411140513.iAE5DOTv056478@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041114062748.GH997@green.homeunix.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:

>On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 05:13:24AM +0000, David Xu wrote:
>  
>
>>http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=65074
>>
>>Change 65074 by davidxu@davidxu_alona on 2004/11/14 05:12:40
>>
>>	1. Fix a race between signal and umtx_unlock. a waiter
>>	   may be resumed by signal and left or exited, heavily
>>	   loaded test causes kernel to crash.
>>	2. Use distributed queue locks instead of single giant
>>	   lock.
>>    
>>
>
>This sounds like it could be why recently valgrind has grown broken,
>and is now entirely non-working and someimes crashes the system?
>
>  
>
Both have bug, valgrind seems have lock leak, umtx code
has race condition.

David Xu



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4197422A.4020905>