Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:31:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ru@FreeBSD.ORG (Ruslan Ermilov), kris@obsecurity.org (Kris Kennaway) Subject: Re: 'make includes' ownership patch Message-ID: <200105281731.KAA56929@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <20010528102611.B16715@dragon.nuxi.com> from "David O'Brien" at "May 28, 2001 10:26:11 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being
> > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile.
> >
> > And perhaps one should go read the commit message that introduced them...
> > it was an experiment, a sample test designed to only be used in -current
> > /usr/src/lib, that BDE, Sheldon and myself had long followon conversations
> > about, and got dropped into the cracks.
>
> What was the reasoning for a serperate owner specification from BIN*?
Simple orthagonality. Ie, each bsd.*.mk file typically has a seperate
set of *{DIR/OWN/GRP/MODE} specs. bsd.inc.mk was cloned from another
bsd.*.mk file.
--
Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105281731.KAA56929>