Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:54:23 -0500 From: Mark Conway Wirt <mark@intrepid.net> To: jahanur <jahanur@jjsoft.com> Cc: Stuart Henderson <sh@eclipse.net.uk>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Media streaming server Message-ID: <19991201145423.G25021@intrepid.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991201123758.8937A-100000@ns2.jjsoft.com>; from jahanur@jjsoft.com on Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 12:40:25PM -0600 References: <19991130200747.A17859@intrepid.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.991201123758.8937A-100000@ns2.jjsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 12:40:25PM -0600, jahanur wrote: > > Yes I have talked to them about it. And they told me about the basic > server which is 25 concurrect connections. > I think I am going to go with it. > But I would like to ask you another question that you dont have to answer > but it would be help ful if you do: How much extra are isp ppl charging > for providing this service? Well, unless it's a heavy site and imposes some pretty strict constraints on your hardware platform, charging it via bandwidth utilization seems reasonable. I think at this point most -- if not all -- ISPs have a vehicle for charging the customer for "excess" bandwidth utilization. Provided that you have a way to enforce it, that would probably be sufficient. If it's not, you may want to look at your bandwidth policies. --Mark -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991201145423.G25021>