Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 09:52:32 +0100 (BST) From: Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Ted Spradley <tsprad@set.spradley.tmi.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps segfaults since I overclocked. and worries. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980415093433.20406D-100000@dylan> In-Reply-To: <8203.892564455@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > ... it was absolutely necessary that certain ground rules be laid down > and one of those rules is *no overclocking during debugging*. It's a > very simple rule and one which is non-negotiable. Should it be added to either the list charter or the handbook page on the lists then ? [ Perhaps just after the bit about no personal attacks in section 25.1.3, (handbook317.html on www.freebsd.org) because people can get quite vehement about it! =) ] Agreed, It's a really important rule, seemingly an unspoken (even if obvious) one though. Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980415093433.20406D-100000>