Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:44:16 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Call for Testers] ACPI-CA 20071114 Message-ID: <200711161844.27009.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20071116232830.GB7943@bunrab.catwhisker.org> References: <200711161338.54270.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <200711161823.17730.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20071116232830.GB7943@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 16 November 2007 06:28 pm, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 06:23:14PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > ... > > > > > FWIW, I'm pretty sure this is the same (fairly broken) behavior > > > as I see now. > > > > > > The machine is a Dell Inspiron 8200. > > > > You mean it did not improve nor regress anything, right? > > Correct: no leakage of "magic smoke;" no behavioral change that I > see. Good to know. > I didn't even get the LOR (though if that was specific to the IBM > ACPI stuff, it would make a certain amount of sense that I > wouldn'tsee it.) Yes, it was IBM (and Asus) specific issue and I just updated the patchset with the fix. Thanks for the feedback! Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200711161844.27009.jkim>