Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 17:54:20 -0400 From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Borland 16bit bcc vs cc/gcc (float) Message-ID: <199706012154.RAA32452@diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199706010426.NAA11621@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> (message from Michael Smith on Sun, 1 Jun 1997 13:56:32 %2B0930 (CST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> In fact, weren't you also the guy who was unlear on the precedence of >> = vs == ? If so, I think you _really_ need to go by a C book and >> do some brushing up. ;) >> I recommend Harbison & Steele. >I wonder if there would be any chance of shipping K&R 2ed in soft form >with the system? It's my favoured reference 8) Really? I find that the items which I frequently need to refer to are library calls, which aren't discussed in any great detail (where they are discussed at all). -- http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu All my opinions are my own, not the Free Software Foundation's. Second law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation -- core dumped
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706012154.RAA32452>