Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:02:33 +0000 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ), pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml Message-ID: <5.0.2.1.1.20031209190044.02d6c528@popserver.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <xzpvfoq2oyi.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
At 12:46 09/12/2003 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > I was under impression that only authors of new ports are listed there. > > If someone take existing port, he's not automatically listed there. > >Anyone maintaining a port is most definitely a contributor and should >be listed. Is that an official answer? The last thing I want to do is send emails out to 600+ addresses, collect together the responses, and then have to write back to say "oops, sorry, we can't list you after all". Colin Percivalhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.1.20031209190044.02d6c528>