Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:03:45 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/postfix Makefile ports/mail/postfix/files patch-aj Message-ID: <20010914140345.G3913@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010914074749.A52452@leviathan.inethouston.net>; from dwcjr@inethouston.net on Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:47:49AM -0500 References: <200109140322.f8E3M8O68957@freefall.freebsd.org> <86k7z230rg.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20010914125250.B3913@tao.org.uk> <20010914074749.A52452@leviathan.inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:47:49AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > I don't think you needed to bump PORTREVISION, since it was just a > > > typo rather than a bug, and it doesn't require the users to upgrade > > > the port if they configure postfix correctly. > > > > > > Besides, that line doesn't affect anything at all, it seems. :) > > > > Please don't bump the PORTREVISION unnecessarily. Every bump suggests > > to thousands of users that they need to upgrade. That's a lot of wasted > > man-hours if it's not necessary. > > > > I understand the wasted man hours, but how else are you supposed to > get the packages to be recreated without a version bump. I thought > PORTREVISION was exactly for that reason, recreating the packages, > not for much else? Sorry, I thought that the change wasn't functional. Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjuiADEACgkQXVIcjOaxUBa8PACZATBGE8CtpFCPcEXn0+F497zk ArcAoOnfsZb1ugGYtk+Ottsx1v8mzvMK =oKyc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010914140345.G3913>