Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 20:18:06 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Brandon Bergren <bdragon@freebsd.org> Cc: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "<dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>" <dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 0b7472b3d8d2 - main - Mount the EFI system partition (ESP) on newly-installed systems. Message-ID: <CANCZdfqPNf-RW=-T9qk5a4o-rX3CWFVGz0H_hTav-CqnW9JJ=Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <a30870ef-00b1-40b6-b378-033d8737c7e4@www.fastmail.com> References: <202102232124.11NLOT27012354@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <01000177d0e7f033-389acb59-2004-4040-ba7c-762878ef86b4-000000@email.amazonses.com> <dba58a1f-5eb0-da87-7d18-d930aa5d422a@freebsd.org> <CANCZdfoL3QFg9NvpkPW8pfVrNvUK-cTPD2ZGbBr2xxh-0dv=eA@mail.gmail.com> <dc61048c-2cfa-0ff5-0470-e93aa5233aae@freebsd.org> <583f83d8-c78b-d961-d2c5-9693bd36563b@freebsd.org> <743fd126-2077-49b1-9c85-7ccc61616b98@www.fastmail.com> <460ceb98-e0c1-42b3-8e3c-2587c5ce8398@www.fastmail.com> <F4E1978D-DE96-4082-885F-D6686A5D005C@freebsd.org> <CANCZdfpw1%2BsjHVPH4zahywMsLHJ1jKWbnd5A3RjGinu=nQFSGA@mail.gmail.com> <a30870ef-00b1-40b6-b378-033d8737c7e4@www.fastmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 8:01 PM Brandon Bergren <bdragon@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, at 8:39 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > 32-bit Arm can boot via EFI. Just mips* and powerpc*. > > > > There was some rumblings of little endian powerpc64 efi, but I don't > > think it's ready... > > I've never heard of such things. PAPR/LoPAPR/LoPAR (pseries) is specified > as an OpenFirmware platform, and I don't see that changing in the future > given the way it's baked into the spec. And PowerNV is a > minimal-runtime-services platform where the runtime abstraction (OPAL) > calls don't include any sort of way to access disk devices. > > Do you mean alternative firmware for PowerNV? I've heard people talking on > and off about coreboot, but I don't see that becoming mainstream over the > petitboot skiroot payload. > > I don't see the pseries virtualization requirements changing away from > OpenFirmware in the future either, given the OpenFirmware requirement has > been a constant all the way back to CHRP. > There was a working group that was defining powerpc bindings that were being worked on. When I went back to find them again I couldn't, so maybe they came to naught... Warner > > > Yea, we have long since switched our preferred boot on arm to EFI... > > though we don't have installer images for 32bit arm, which is this > > runs... so it's needed for correctness, but not a practical > > difference... > > > > Warner > > -- > Brandon Bergren > bdragon@FreeBSD.org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqPNf-RW=-T9qk5a4o-rX3CWFVGz0H_hTav-CqnW9JJ=Q>