Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:11:31 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not getting an IPv6 in a jail Message-ID: <4AA6F2B3.8000909@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090908234719.GC418@sysmon.tcworks.net> References: <ff6efe7e0909011230i414b6791k707f5c58383e9b53@mail.gmail.com> <20090902160440.GA28417@sd-13813.dedibox.fr> <4A9E98AD.1070202@FreeBSD.org> <200909030808.08440.jhb@freebsd.org> <4AA6A22B.1070402@FreeBSD.org> <20090908234719.GC418@sysmon.tcworks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Lambert wrote:
> Some of us are just using a jail per service to make the service more
> portable between these massively overpowered machines these days.
Yes, that makes total sense. I'm not saying that running it in a jail
is a _bad_ thing, just that perhaps it is overkill.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AA6F2B3.8000909>