Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:29:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports and -current Message-ID: <20030920062940.GA35054@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de> References: <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:14:07AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Well, for weeks now I couldn't compile (almost) any port. It seems that= =20 > ports aren't tested against -current. Is that true? No. > Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are= =20 > easy to fix others aren't) also the entire new kde fails. > Is there no aim to have ports running on -current? Also incorrect. The 4.9 ports freeze is holding up commits to fix compile failures on 5.1. Kris --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/a/PTWry0BWjoQKURAkrIAJ0a5yOKuyBDScP3hd2wzLJKjuMlcgCgpNul Ic8QE58acIoGIcpXvotLJMM= =qx/T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030920062940.GA35054>