Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 15:53:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Sebastian Ahndorf <webmaster@it-is-warlock.de> Cc: Imobach ??? Sosa <imobachgs@banot.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts Message-ID: <20050530225340.GA34233@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <429B7DF6.8040704@it-is-warlock.de> References: <20050529221024.4fu2p4yjusk04k0g@mail.banot.net> <20050529212705.GA64753@xor.obsecurity.org> <1117447400.5384.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050530104928.GB79877@sr.se> <1117465224.9934.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <429B44BD.7070806@pp.nic.fi> <20050530191843.GA82875@xor.obsecurity.org> <429B7DF6.8040704@it-is-warlock.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:56:22PM +0200, Sebastian Ahndorf wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>Both sides must have same config, autosense should work if there is no= =20 > >>config possibility in other end. > > > > > >autosense may in fact not work, especially on low-quality NICs like rl. > > >=20 > I don't agree to that. > I had similar problems with my network using a cheap switch with some=20 > realtek nics. I had the nics running 100baseTX Full Duplex. > Changing this to autosense made the problems gone. Your one example does not disprove the statement. I've seen this problem myself, and so have many others. Kris --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCm5lzWry0BWjoQKURAq+GAKCVkovPoSPq/L13mV2uSklmECMPgACg6Nzf tiASRGMAINcB5jO6oWFysv4= =bALp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050530225340.GA34233>