Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:39:56 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@acm.org> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: imp@bsdimp.com Subject: Re: Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything Message-ID: <3FBCFC6C.3090107@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <20031120072214.GH49554@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <62981.24.0.61.35.1069202574.squirrel@mail.yazzy.org> <200311190103.hAJ13Nlg000923@dyson.jdyson.com> <20031119015433.GN30485@roark.gnf.org> <3FBC2053.6040208@mindspring.com> <20031120022009.GB29530@dan.emsphone.com> <3FBC29EF.3030009@mindspring.com> <3FBC50DB.3000002@acm.org> <20031120072214.GH49554@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:27:55PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>Maybe it's time to separate these two functions? >>I would be content to have a static /sbin/sh >>that is used as the system script interpreter for >>rc scripts, etc. > > > And /usr/bin/sh as a user shell? I was thinking /bin/sh for the user shell and /sbin/sh for the system script interpreter. There must be a /bin/sh and given that there are many user scripts that rely on it, it seems that it must be a user shell. Tim Kientzle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FBCFC6C.3090107>