Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:26:11 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <q@uni.de> To: toni@stderror.at Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0-STABLE ??? Message-ID: <20030121172611.3d2f7082.q@uni.de> In-Reply-To: <20030120200112.GA98053@devil.stderror.at> References: <200301192336.h0JNam2r036785@lurza.secnetix.de> <01ad01c2c02c$e84eaf40$0101a8c0@cascade> <20030120032658.GA35779@gforce.johnson.home> <20030120200112.GA98053@devil.stderror.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2003/01/20-21:01:12 Toni Schmidbauer wrote: >On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 09:26:59PM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote: >> So if one decides to make the jump to 5.0 and wants to track >> development, should -CURRENT be tracked or RELENG_5_0? > >-CURRENT > >RELENG_5_0 contains only critical bugfixes and security updates, >as mentioned above. To finally clear things: Where will RELENG_5_1 come from? I guess it will be branched from -CURRENT too? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030121172611.3d2f7082.q>