Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 00:04:43 -0400 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: =?windows-1252?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: svn commit: r266238 - head/contrib/ldns/ldns Message-ID: <4A83A11B-EFDD-46C5-B9D4-D81EBD4FAAAE@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86ppjdjg2c.fsf@nine.des.no> References: <201405161532.s4GFWGvh006504@svn.freebsd.org> <20140517112645.N925@besplex.bde.org> <86ppjdjg2c.fsf@nine.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 16, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> writes: >> -Wcast-qual is especially onerous in contrib'ed code written to a = lower >> standard. >=20 > Well, I could have just lowered WARNS... LDNS actually isn't that = bad. > Unbound is much worse. >=20 >> Converting this to use system endianness conversion functions = wouldn't >> take much more churn. >=20 > Do our standard endianness conversion functions handle unaligned > accesses? No. The warning appears to be telling us something that=92s being = papered over. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A83A11B-EFDD-46C5-B9D4-D81EBD4FAAAE>