Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 05:17:34 -0500 (EST) From: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> Cc: Alwyn Schoeman <alwyns@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org>, Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@nojunk.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FFS vs ext2fs (Was: Re: Not enough information) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060517060.17839-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060514270.17839-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Agh, I meant Alwyn. Need sleep. On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Adam wrote: >Alexey made no statement about performance, so don't turn this into an >issue it isn't. > >On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Alexey N. Dokuchaev wrote: > >>> Recently FreeBSD's not so great filesystem got corrupted. Guess what got >>>damaged? Package information, so now I can't get any information on >>>installed packages.UPgrading ports, I mean installed ports? Probably the >>>only point its got going >> >>Bullsh*t! FFS totally outperforms ext2fs, and I've never heard any >>opposite statements. >> >>./danfe >> >> >> >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message >> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060517060.17839-100000>