Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:32:17 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 210685] [exp-run] lang/python27: Update to 2.7.12
Message-ID:  <bug-210685-21822-pvO9xjNosW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-210685-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-210685-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210685

--- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #7)

We technically don't need to (nor have we) exp-run Python ports on each upd=
ate.
exp-run ? was only set as a candidate/option, and it can be removed

If combined changes are run in the same exp-run, it may obscure the underly=
ing
cause of the failure, particularly if there's interactions between the two
changes

However, if it is in fact too burdensome, feel free to run them in the same
exp-run, applying each patch from their respective issues

Given the setuptools changes applies to all versions of python (via the
respective py-setuptoolsXY ports), they should be applied separately, and t=
hey
dont/shouldnt block each other, hence the request in comment 6

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210685-21822-pvO9xjNosW>