Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:12:50 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml Message-ID: <20060210181249.GA949@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> References: <200602091800.k19I0gHR024988@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060210171224.GI21499@submonkey.net> <1139592139.790.7.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <200602101235.54875.jhb@freebsd.org> <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> wrote: >> You can use common sense though. He was obviously a ports committer. > > Guys, I'm lost. What are we arguing about? > > He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since > the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different > types of commit bits? > > Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit > bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access > files. :-) No arguing from me. I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we don't know what this guy was working on''. It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060210181249.GA949>