Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:22:40 +0200
From:      Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Eric Anholt <anholt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci agp_i810.c
Message-ID:  <1159428160.671.35.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1159423952.671.11.camel@localhost>
References:  <200609270638.k8R6csJ0044991@repoman.freebsd.org> <1159423952.671.11.camel@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 08:12 +0200, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 06:38 +0000, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > anholt      2006-09-27 06:38:54 UTC
> > 
> >   FreeBSD src repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     sys/pci              agp_i810.c 
> >   Log:
> >   Add support for 945G/GM AGP chipsets.
> >   
> >   The key problem was that the aperture size detection using the MSAC bit
> >   doesn't work -- the bit appears to be set even when it shouldn't be.  Linux
> >   takes a different approach, testing for a bit of the GMADR (PCIR_BAR(2)) being
> >   set.  However, as I don't think that's a safe way to test aperture size, we
> >   just allocate the resource and check its size.  This also pointed out that
> >   agp_generic_attach hadn't been allocating our aperture resource, which may
> >   have caused problems in some cases.
> >   
> >   Also corrected is a minor copy-and-pasteo in an error case.
> 
> Hmm, I have a HP NX7400 laptop with an Intel i945 chipset, and it's
> running a very fresh current (GENERIC, no changes made whatsoever).
> However, I see the following in my dmesg when I start X (I *think* it
> started appearing just after your commit to agp_i810.c):

Ok, I can confirm that reverting back to revision 1.38 of agp_i810.c
fixes the problem.

-- 
Joel




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1159428160.671.35.camel>