Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:24:11 +0100 From: "Tariq Rashid" <tariq@inty.net> To: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: kame ipsec vs. openbsd ipsec / netgraph ipsec node? Message-ID: <MPENKFCCIIDAJKJJOLBHMEAJCNAA.tariq@inty.net> In-Reply-To: <2c1d01c1db3b$460c7720$52557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On a slightly side note, I'd much prefer to see FreeBSD with IPSEC pseudo-interfaces a la OpenBSD/linux. I'd much prefer to work with say, enc0, or ipsec1, than mess around with guf half-tunnels.... makes complex routing much easier.... Just a thought - perhaps a netgraph ipsec node is the way forward? Tariq intY (www.inty.com) has automatically scanned this email using Sophos Anti-Virus To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?MPENKFCCIIDAJKJJOLBHMEAJCNAA.tariq>