Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:41:01 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>, Michael Larsen <mlarsen@tech-nic.net>, Roger Hardiman <roger@cs.strath.ac.uk>, small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PicoBSD changes for 4.0-current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001292040040.73514-100000@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000130132119.A55643@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > Given the recent discussion about maintainers in general, I think we > should only have maintainers for those products where one person does > the bulk (> 75%) of the work. I don't think PicoBSD fits into this > category, so I'd suggest that we don't have a maintainer. How about MAINTAINER = freebsd-small, then, to indicate that changes should be passed by this list? Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001292040040.73514-100000>