Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:23:53 +0100 From: Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es> To: Lista <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: NAT Message-ID: <3C7251E9.4B250385@it.uc3m.es>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I have been doing some perfomance tests using the standard NAT implementation for FreeBsd, and also using NAT-PT, with the KAME implementation. In throughput and delay terms, the results are much worse for NAT4. May that result be due to the overloading introduced by ALG in the standard implementation? Maybe it has to analyse the packets deeper?? Thanks in advance. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C7251E9.4B250385>