Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:13:43 +0100 From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Importing netbsd cdb Message-ID: <20131106131343.GA28180@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <20131106084550.GA21489@ass.pp.htv.fi> References: <20131027232628.GB74512@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20131105220225.GF37879@caravan.chchile.org> <20131106084550.GA21489@ass.pp.htv.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Atte Peltomaki wrote: > At least randomly googled third-party benchmarks suggest that CDB is > vastly superior to BDB: > http://www.dmo.ca/blog/benchmarking-hash-databases-on-large-data/ Please note that the term "CDB" is somewhat overloaded, e.g. there are a number of completely different implementations and file formats. Joerg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131106131343.GA28180>