Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 16:01:24 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> Cc: John Marino <dragonflybsd@marino.st>, NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <testing@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Need help fixing failing locale tests Message-ID: <20151115150124.GE93991@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <564882E1.5050404@freebsd.org> References: <CAG=rPVc1t2q_MR99iyWYfy4xrCy==KA1yT=EAaa2twiHoC=zcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVfK6ZyWJhtuBihmj%2BWNp94auCJ3kDqoQm-ygXNpiLeatA@mail.gmail.com> <69242BD8-9010-47F0-9706-BE206376ECEA@gmail.com> <289892B6-EACE-4BDA-B838-D3DC750319DE@gmail.com> <56482FA9.2010803@marino.st> <56487973.5070803@freebsd.org> <20151115124656.GB93991@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <564880FA.5000009@freebsd.org> <20151115130009.GC93991@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <564882E1.5050404@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 04:04:33PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 15.11.2015 16:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 03:56:26PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >> On 15.11.2015 15:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >>>> On 15.11.2015 10:09, John Marino wrote: > >>>> ISO8859-1 locales are legacy even if obsoleted in modern world (I ag= ree > >>>> with that). Lots of ports (even at configure stage!) have checks for > >>>> them. Since we generate locales from CLDR now, it will be no cost to > >>>> bring all 8859-1 back to not violate POLA and not fix every failing = port. > >>>> > >>> Exp-run have been made and no ports were failing with the removed loc= ales. > >> > >> There is soft-fail, configure just marks that locales are not supported > >> and use "C". Sorry I don't remember port names where I saw it right now > >> and don't have a time to search for them right now too. Soft-fails (li= ke > >> in tcl with nl_langinfo) are almost impossible to detect excepting > >> specific situation happens or source code inspection. Do we ever need > >> them when there is no harm to keep 8859-1 locales? > >=20 > > Is it ok if I readd those locales as aliases on 8859-15? >=20 > It is hacking solution leads to wrong collating order and character > classes. It is better to generate true 8859-1 just in the same way you > already do for 8859-15. >=20 > BTW, I can't check right now, but in case 8859-5 is removed too, it is > better to restore it, it was used in Suns as their standard Russian > encoding. >=20 I have restored the 8859-1 The 8859-5 were never removed: be_BY.ISO8859-5 ru_RU.ISO8859-5 sr_Cyrl_RS.ISO8859-5 uk_UA.ISO8859-5 Best regards, Bapt --OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlZInkQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex91wCgt+K0f8xPqxx7i0lLWXHBtrUI m70AnR2oSLlWYzm2dQi+31fHlxKkSq8l =D2Lo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151115150124.GE93991>