Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 00:09:57 +0300 (MSK) From: oZZ!!! <osa@etrust.ru> To: Matt Behrens <matt@megaweapon.zigg.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How's the latest -SNAP? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901040008140.480-100000@ozz.etrust.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901031426340.7296-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Matt Behrens wrote: > As smoothly as aout-to-elf seems to be going along, I'm going to > be hitting the sysinstall freshly when I'm ready to move my main > machine to 3.0 in a couple weeks. (Reasoning is too long to go > into here, but they include more garbage than is worth tracking > down from ports that have misbehaved in the past and left files > strewn all about /usr/local as well as the need for a different > partitioning scheme to faciliate new hard drives I'm bringing in.) > > My questions are these: > > 1. Are the SNAPs fully ELF? all SNAPs after 3.0 in ELF > > 2. Are the new bootloaders used? yes & what do think when you say "new bootloaders"? > > 3. What is the shape of installing from the SNAP in general? Any > gotchas? > > TIA. (I couldn't find much from the archives.) > > - Matt "Zigg" Behrens <matt@zigg.com> > Network Administrator, zigg.com <http://www.zigg.com/>; > Engineer, Nameless IRC Network <http://www.nameless.net/>; > Rgdz, Osokin Sergey aka oZZ, osa@etrust.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901040008140.480-100000>