Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:35:28 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: dgilbert@dclg.ca Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame Message-ID: <xzphdz2qicf.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040111.141505.108953149.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:15:05 -0700 (MST)") References: <16385.37893.652979.822920@canoe.dclg.ca> <14092.1073845446@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040111.141505.108953149.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > Maybe this would be a good test-case for seeing how well it works? > Maybe not. We do need to run a few more test-cases for things through > this scenario... I'm not sure this one is well suited to it. If we toss out Vinum, there's a significant risk that 5.3 will ship without RAID support at all. I'm pretty certain we don't want that. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphdz2qicf.fsf>