Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:19:48 -0800 (PST) From: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Altq adulteration Message-ID: <552054.10376.qm@web63902.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Given that 99% of high performance systems don't use altq, what was/is the
reasoning to adulterate the base queuing system with ALTQ checks, rather
than having altq replace the queuing/handoff routines for the small
percentage of implementations that actual use it?
I understand why it was initially done. What I don't understand is why
antiquated shaping infrastructure remains in the base path in 7.0 and 8.0.
Barney
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?552054.10376.qm>