Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:27:59 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Subject: Re: libkse -> libpthread Message-ID: <3EA4382F.6CA7C63A@mindspring.com> References: <20030421124423.Y76635-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Since libkse seems to be generally useful, anyone mind if I > > go back to installing it as libpthread? > > There is some question over whether kse or thr will be the default > threading implementation for 5.1. I think this should be discussed before > we decide on what lib uses libpthread. Isn't libthr really just libkse with N = M? These should behave exactly the same, right? It should even be possible to drop the UTS out of the picture for everything but signal handling, I think (i.e. it would never get upcalled) in the 1:1 case, if this were done? -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EA4382F.6CA7C63A>