Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:04:18 +0100 From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch regarding icmp bandwidth limiting Message-ID: <20011105180418.A32828@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <20011105102130.H29695-100000@achilles.silby.com>; from silby@silby.com on Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:23:42AM -0600 References: <20011105144330.A29038@gvr.gvr.org> <20011105102130.H29695-100000@achilles.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:23:42AM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > The first number is the rate at which the machine would be responding > without limiting enabled. The second number tells you the rate at which > it is responding. Changing from a pre to a post increment isn't going to > change what you're seeing. > I was thinking the same, but still the message puzzled me. How about changing it from: Limiting icmp ping response to %d packet per second for %d received -Guido To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011105180418.A32828>