Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:43:26 -0700 From: "Hidetoshi Shimokawa" <simokawa@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Sean Bruno" <sbruno@miralink.com> Cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fwcontrol failure with multiple firewire cards Message-ID: <626eb4530806271843w998770cg54d747663f9bbddc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48659262.8080604@miralink.com> References: <48659262.8080604@miralink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
To handle multiple card, you need '-u' option to be the first argument if I remember correctly. I think adding new feature is ok but you should be careful to change the behavior . On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Sean Bruno <sbruno@miralink.com> wrote: > I noted very strange behavior from all pieces of the firewire stack while > testing this week when there are multiple firewire cards in a machine. > Before I start submitting patches to fwcontrol/firewire for these issues, is > there any signifcant backwards compatibility issues I need to be concerned > about? > > Should I come up with a way to make fwcontrol behave normally unless there > is a new argument(eg -B to iterate over multiple cards)? Or is ok to trash > the old behavior in favor of one that understands multiple cards? > > Sean > > -- /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ simokawa@FreeBSD.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?626eb4530806271843w998770cg54d747663f9bbddc>