Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 12:32:41 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Cc: Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r283424 - in head/sys: amd64/linux modules/linux64 Message-ID: <1834151.lrAIDRMoJM@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <20150525151339.GM1394@zxy.spb.ru> References: <201505241607.t4OG7C7b073936@svn.freebsd.org> <3590632.VFQBH2fsZP@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20150525151339.GM1394@zxy.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, May 25, 2015 06:13:39 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:40:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Some other related questions are: can we revive print/acroread now and or > > use a 64-bit flash plugin after these changes? > > I am still use print/acroread. > As I know removing print/acroread irrelevant to linuxator. > This is will by security reasson. > I am don't open suspicious pdf from suspicious source and just ignore > this removing. I mean more if these updates allow us to update to a newer version of print/acroread that would no longer be vulnerable (if such a thing exists) whether 32- or 64-bit. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1834151.lrAIDRMoJM>